University-Industry Collaborative Projects: Analysis and Proposal of Management Practices

Ana Carolina Kayser, Serje Schmidt, Rafael Stoffel Dal Ri

Resumo


This study aims to identify good managerial practices on university-industry collaborative projects. The literature review was based on studies that analyzed management of collaborative projects and included authors such as Davenport et al. (1998), Moro-Valentin et al (2003), Barnes et al (2006), and Albertin and Amaral (2010). An empirical research was carried out by studying multiple cases of University-Industry collaborative projects in Brazil. Project managers, entrepreneurs and researchers involved in such projects answered a semi-structured interview that helped understand how they are managed. Results showed that best practices already suggested by literature are implemented, as well as new practices that are positively associated with project performance. Setting clear and realistic goals, defining clear responsibilities, writing clear agreements, and communicating effectively were practices found in literature. New practices consisted of maintaining close contact with partners, systematically recording information on the project, conducting startup meetings to formalize and disseminate information about the project, holding periodical meetings to monitor the project, using software or a project management platform, and clearly defining processes. A guide presenting ten best practices for managing University-Industry collaborative projects was created based on the results found in this study.


Palavras-chave


Project Management. University-Industry Collaboration. Inter-organizational Relations. Good Management Practices.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Albertin, E. V., & Amaral, D. C. (2010) Contexto da parceria como qualificador da gestão de projetos universidade - empresa. Revista Produção, São Paulo, 20(2), 224-236.

Amaral, D. C., Conforto, E.C., Benassi, J. L. G., & Araújo, C. (2011). Gerenciamento ágil de projetos: aplicação em produtos inovadores. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Ahuja, G. (2000). The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 317-343.

Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408.

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo (edição revista e ampliada). São Paulo: Edições 70.

Barnes, T. A., Pashby, I. R., & Gibbons, A. M. (2006). Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 395-404.

Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2), 1–23.

Brocke, J. V., & Lippe, S. (2015). Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1022–1039.

Burrel, G., & Morgan, G. (1998). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

Castells, M. (1999). A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

Costa, P. R., Porto, G. S., & Feldhaus, D. (2010). Gestão da cooperação empresa universidade: o caso de uma multinacional brasileira. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(1), 100-121.

Davenport, S., Davies, J. D., & Grimes, C. (1998). Collaborative research programs: building trust from difference. Technovation, 19(1), 31-40.

Ejaz, N., Hussain, J., Shabbir, F., Shamim, M. A., Naeem, U. A., Tahir, M. F., Ahmad, N., & Farooq, Q.U. (2013). Assessment of most critical success factors for mega construction projects in Pakistan. Life Science Journal, 10(10), 255-261.

Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Hélice Tríplice: Universidade-Indústria-Governo. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.

Garg, P., & Agarwal, D. (2014). Critical success factors for ERP implementation in a Fortis hospital: An empirical investigation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 402-423.

Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Madhavan, R. R. (2011). How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 207-224.

Hagedoorn, J., Link, A., & Vonortas, N. (2000). Research partnerships, Research Policy, 29 (4), 567–586.

Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.

Heravi, G.; & Ilbeigi, M. (2012). Development of a comprehensive model for construction project success evaluation by contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(5), 526-542.

Hwang, B. G., & Lim, E. S. J. (2013). Critical Success Factors for Key Project Players and Objectives: Case Study of Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 204-215.

Johansson, J., & Kurkkio, M. (2007). Management and evaluation of collaborative R&D-projects: The paradox of long-term relationships. Nordic Academy of Management, August XX.

Jones, C., & Lichtenstein, B.B. (2008). Temporary inter organizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In: CROPPER, S. et al. The Oxford handbook of Inter-organizational relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jordan, G. B., Hage, J., Mote, J., & Hepler, B. (2005). Investigating differences among research projects and implications for managers. R&D Management. 35, 501–511.

Keraminiyage, K. P., Haigh, K.P, & Amaratunga, R.D.G. (2009). Achieving success in collaborative research: the role of virtual research environments. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITCon) 14, 59–69.

Kerzner, H. (2006). Gestão de projetos: as melhores práticas (2a ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

König, B., Diehl, K., Tscherning, K., & Helming, K. (2013). A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Research Policy 42(1), 261–272.

Lagzian, F., Abrizah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2013). An identification of a model for digital library critical success factors. The Electronic Library, 31(1), 5-23.

Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2013). Open collaboration for innovation: principles and performance, Organization Science, 25(5), 1414–1433.

Lynskey, M. J. (1999). The transfer of resources and competencies for developing technological capabilities – The Case of Fujitsu – ICL. Tecnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), 317-336.

Moro-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanches, A., & Guerra-Martin, L. A. (2003). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17-40.

Mozzato, A. R., & Grzybovski, D. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo como técnica de análise de dados qualitativos no campo da administração: potencial e desafios. Revista de Administração Contemporânea RAC, 15(4), 731-747.

Nagano, M. S., Stefanovitz, J. P., & Vick, T. E. (2014). Caracterização de Processos e Desafios de Empresas Industriais Brasileiras na Gestão da Inovação. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Negócios, 16(51), 163-179.

Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3/4), 137-168.

Plonski, G. A. (1994). Academic-Industry Relations in Midle-Income Countries: East Europe and Ibero-America. Science and Public Policy, 21, 109-116.

Powell, W. W., Kenneth, W. K., & Doerr, L.S. (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.

Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). A Nova era da inovação: A inovação Focada no Relacionamento com o Cliente. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

PMI - Project Management Institute. (2012). Conjunto de Conhecimentos em Gerenciamento de Projetos. [Manual]. Global Standard. Campus Boulevar: Newtown Square. PMI.

Rashvand, P., & Zaimi, A. M. M. (2014). Critical criteria on client and customer satisfaction for the issue of performance measurement. Journal of Management in Engineering, 10(1), 10 – 18.

Ruuska, I., & Teigland, R. (2009). Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public–private partnerships — a case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27, 323–334.

Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicity funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509-532.

Soda, G. (2011). The management of firms' alliance network positioning: Implications for innovation. European Management Journal, 29, 377- 388.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/10.5585

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Revista de Gestão e Projetos e-ISSN: 2236-0972
Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional